Can Quality Overcome Big Challenges?

 

There’s an interesting scenario going on right now in both the Foster City single family market as well as the condo/townhouse market. Those scenarios beg the larger question of whether or not the quality of these individual homes can overcome the challenges that also exist in their locations. First off there’s a new 4 bedroom, 2 bath listing at 919 Marlin listed by Ronda O’Leary of Coldwell Banker for $949,000. The place is absolutely drop dead gorgeous! Look at those pics…it’s amazing. Who isn’t going to like that house? The question is, will the location on Marlin, a busier street, have an impact that could slow the sale of render that price to be too high? We’ll see…my bet is that it won’t have that big of an impact.

The second example is the townhouse at 606 Portofino at the Islands listed for $795,000 by Jina Farzinpour with Re/Max Star Properties. This is by far the most gorgeous unit I’ve seen at the Islands. It’s a large 3 bedroom unit on the widest water. Tons of upgrades! The question is, can this quality overcome the $720.00 a month HOA dues and the possible $40,000 assessment that could be looming there. Honestly, it would sure be tempting to live on the water like that. It’s been quite awhile since there’s been a comp at the Islands in that price range. I’m really interested to see if that place sells.

The Importance of Relationships

handshake

About a week ago I showed a house in Foster City to some folks who expressed some interest in the place. I called the listing agent, who I’ve known for a long time, and asked some questions. I found out two important things…1) the home was getting plenty of interest and there was a possibility of multiple offers, and 2) the listing agent was willing to look at an offer that I would write immediately. No waiting…and no competition for the buyer. Why, you ask, would that happen? Because the relationship that’s been established with that agent insures her/him that our potential transaction will be smooth.

This isn’t all about me of course, this is the story of the value to the consumer of working with an experienced agent. It’s become sort of common in the last few years for buyers to ask me if I’m willing to kick back commission the way rebating online real estate companies or other discount brokers do. These brokers have created a fantasy world where they’re selling the notion that a real estate agent’s job is a commodity. That we’re simply interchangeable parts, order takers and secretaries who merely know how to fill out forms and present them. Sometimes it works out and it’s true too! Lot’s of the rest of the time it’s not true. I think most of the time it’s not true.

There’s probably 100 reasons why experience is beneficial to a buyer or seller, yet I know that the Internet allows people to study and gain knowledge that wasn’t available to them just a few years ago. There’s certainly one way that the Internet or the rebaters can never touch and that’s in the area mentioned above…relationships. I can’t tell you how many times a client of mine has landed on a home in a multiple offer environment because of the relationship I’ve had with a listing agent. It’s also been enormously important for me as a listing agent to be able to identify an experienced agent that my seller can trust to close escrow on time. Relationships are also important in connection to lenders, title people, and inspectors as well.

Lots of this is simple human nature. You spend 20 years in one community and you get to know your coworkers and other agents. Naturally, you’re going to feel comfortable working with them. Working with somebody like this sure beats having an offer faxed by an “agent” who wasn’t in real estate just a year ago.

Foundation Issues

foundation

Last week we were talking about landfill and some folks fear of liquifaction. It made me think of the more chronic and pertinent issue of foundation problems. Here’s a post I wrote a couple of years ago that’s still as relevant as ever:

This post has been coming for a long time, and on this topic I want to be really clear. 1) foundation problems are common in Foster City and 2) those foundation problems are not a reason to avoid purchasing a home in Foster City. For several years, many many homes have had issues with their foundations in this area. I met an engineer once who told me that he had fixed 60 foundations in Foster City over the years. I’m not an engineer, but as I understand it the majority of issues come from exposed rebar that’s rusted over time, has expanded and then cracks or breaks up the concrete around it. I’ve also heard that the high sodium content in the Foster City landfill impacts this rusting problem a bunch. The photo above is a typical example. The pieces on the right have fallen away from the rest of the foundation and the rusted rebar is obvious. The weakened condition of a foundation with this type of problem theoretically has an adverse effect on it’s seismic stability.

Several contractors or engineers have made a good business out of resolving these issues. The fix on the foundation pictured above is slightly under $24,000. If you’re looking at a hillside property in San Mateo, Belmont or San Carlos you could easily find drainage issues that can have similar expense and that certainly doesn’t prevent people from buying homes in those locations. Foundation problems in Foster City are correctable and shouldn’t frighten anyone out of buying here.

It is wise, however, for a buyer to be diligent in inspecting the home they are purchasing…and that means hiring an engineer or qualified foundation contractor (one who has experience with this type of issue in Foster City is best) to inspect this area. Most property inspections will note rusted rebar if found but not go any further in explaining a solution for it. Be proactive, if there’s even a hint of a problem on a report get further inspection.

New Inventory

It’s so funny how cyclical this crazy real estate business is. It often seems like, all at once, a ton of new listings come on the market after long periods of nothing. We’re in just such a period right now. Since the 4th of July, there’s been 11 new active single family houses arrive on the market in Foster City. Pretty remarkable…and one of them sold too. I suspect that folks simply waited to market their homes until after the 4th and here we are with the new inventory. Some of them stand out and it’s worth mentioning them:

379 Bluefish Ct listed by Joe Benvenuto of Alain Pinel for $869,000. This is  really a terrific house, in great shape and on a large (9360 sq ft) lot that’s adjacent to a park. Remodeled kitchen. I like this house alot and based upon how it looks versus competition I’m predicting multiple offers.

251 Puffin Ct listed by Vivian Heinzel, Broker for $859,000. I actually don’t know if this house has major structural issues or not, but this price for a 4 bedroom, 3 bath, 2450 sq ft 2 story house is incredible. Again, depending on what issues are presented here…it’s going to get plenty of interest.

711 Baffin listed by Irina Sikela of Advanced RES for $1,220,000. This is a 5 bedroom, 3 bath, 2250 sq ft house in a great location near Sea Cloud Park. Nice place too!

These are my favorites from this current group…but there’s 8 other choices as well. An interesting summer so far in Foster City.

A Level Playing Field

This really is a strange market. Some houses come up and just sit. There’s listings out there that have been around, seemingly, forever. There’s plenty of these in Foster City. Others, particularly those that are gorgeous and are priced right, get swept up in multiple offer frenzy. With some listings it’s still 2005. I’ve seen old school multiple offer insanity several times this year on listings in Millbrea, Burlingame, Palo Alto, San Carlos, Redwood City, Belmont, San Mateo and, yes, Foster City. I’ve also seen houses stay in the market for 200 days or more…go figure! In one case in Burlingame recently, a probate on Rivera was listed for $1,025,000. Honestly, the house needs plenty of work but it’s a good location and the house got 19 offers. Since it’s a probate it needs to go through the court confirmation process and thus an overbid amount is published. That means that the court provides folks with an amount you would need to offer to outbid the existing high bid. It’s a published figure. That amount? $1,365,500. In another case, a house on Colorados in Millbrae, listed for $1,075,000 sold for $1,280,000.

In both of the above mentioned cases, the houses had fixed dates and times for reviewing offers. Particularly in the probate case, there couldn’t be much more of a level playing field. The offers were due at one time and the court allows other interested parties to try again if they can by stating the price to everyone. As for the Millbrae listing, I have no doubt that the folks who got that house paid WAY over their competition for that house…they must have really wanted it badly. I guess my point here is that at the very least all potential buyers on both of these listings had the opportunity to take their best shot. In alot of other instances lately, it hasn’t been that way…and it should.

In one instance, the listing agent established a set date to review offers. Offers were presented and the listing agent stalled for an additional 48 hours, collected a few more offers and then ratified. Each time leveraging the earlier offers to increase the total the seller could get. Seems sort of unfair if you were the ones making the earlier offer, doesn’t it? I mean, you make an offer at the deadline based upon the knowledge that there’s 3 offers and then 2 other parties come in 2 days later, they have a distinct advantage. Or how about this, you present an offer on a listing with no competition and after a couple of days the listing agent tells you that the seller can’t make a decision for another week because she’s just too busy. Meanwhile, the house will be held open this coming weekend. If your a buyer you’re certainly going to feel like the seller and agent are going to “shop” your offer to any other potential buyer who may call in this time period, won’t you? It’s actually unethical to do this since the purchase contract clearly states that “time is of the essence in this contract”. Oh well?

Not much you can do in these circumstances. It would sure be nice if there was a uniform way to insure a level playing field though.

A Little Chilly

Well, this is not really the kind of chilly I was thinking about. The kind I was thinking about sort of represents cold rather than hot. Not freezing or icy mind you…but chilly none the less.  What I’m talking about, of course, is the 2011 Foster City real estate market. Not as cold as it was in 2009 but not as warm as it was in 2010 either. Nowhere near as hot as it was in 2005. This market is sort of interesting…I think values have fallen this year from last. As of today there are 34 active single family homes on the market. There’s 18 pending sales and that actually isn’t bad! Having said that, there’s 11 homes that have been on the market for at least 80 days, 10 of them over 100 days and 5 of them over 198 days on market. That’s a long time. There’s also 11 of the 34 that have been on the market for two weeks or less. It’s going to be interesting to see how these new listings will be received. I think it’s all going to depend upon how their priced and whether or not they’re seen as a value. Here’s some good ones to look at:

943 Lurline listed by Nancy Rancatore of Coldwell Banker for $1,348,000. This is one gorgeous wide water house! really done well and in a terrific location. It’s 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths and 2620 sq ft. I hope this one sells quickly because it’s really beautiful.

908 Corsair listed by Bob Cala, Broker for $1,250,000. This is a 3170 sq ft 4 bedroom, 3 bath waterfront and it sure seems to be priced right. It’s in a good location and compares favorably to others in this price range. Should be interesting to watch.

766 Vespucci listed by Jan Majeski of Alian Pinel for $899,900. OK, it’s got a $500 HOA dues issue…899 is a terrific price for this REO. It’s a 2760 sq ft 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath house in great shape.

Like I said, there’s several more new ones. Can a top remodel compensate for a slightly higher price? Can a low price compensate for high HOAs…we’ll see.

Is It As Is, Or Isn’t It As Is?

Say that 5 times real fast! Believe it or not, there once was a time when writing an offer “As Is” was relatively rare. Even in 2011 most offers I’ve seen and written are of the “As Is” variety. Most of the reason for this is because, in this area at least, sellers, for the most part, have taken on the responsibility of initiating pest and property inspections before putting their homes up for sale. Buyers can educate themselves about the subject property before writing an offer and can thereby make a decision as to whether or not the flaws and problems with the place are tolerable or workable to them. As you might have guessed…seller’s like to see an “As Is” offer.

Here’s the thing: “As Is” doesn’t always mean “As Is”…even though most sellers think it does. A buyer entering into an escrow with an “As Is” sale can still do further inspections on the subject property. If the further inspections turn up an issue not on the original disclosures, or in the sellers inspections, the buyers have the right to either change their minds about the purchase, or ask for the problem to be resolved by the seller. A few years ago, representing a buyer, I sold a house “As Is” where the seller had, mistakenly, not done a property inspection. We did one, and discovered a foot of standing water under the house. I recommended the buyers get an engineer to look at the house and he discovered some early stages of foundation problems that were developing as a result of the bad drainage. He gave us a bid of $25,000 to correct the problem. We gave the $25,000 bid to the seller…she paid it. Her alternative going forward (if my buyers backed out) would have been to now sell the house with both our property inspection and our engineer’s report and bid. Certainly that would have effected the home’s marketability and who knows how much longer it would have taken for her to get a new buyer.

I’ve seen this happen several times. If you’re a seller, always do inspections up front and know what’s going on with your home. If you’re a buyer with an “As Is” offer and you have some questions or concerns about some aspect of the home, don’t be afraid to do further inspections.

Winning

Very often I’ll meet with buyers about to embark on this journey to buy a home, and many times it’s their first time doing so, and they seem to have an attitude that they need to win in the process of getting the place. It’s like its some big competition and its them vs the sellers of the world. They have a very clear goal that it’s going to be them that is declared a winner at the end of the day and somehow they’ll be anointed as victorious champions. Maybe even they’ll pop some champaigne!

I’m really not quite sure why this happens, maybe it’s just the way some folks are hard wired, but it can certainly add some stress to the buuying process when this occurs. I’ve seen in some cases that the process actually becomes more important than the house itself. “OK, we love the house…but I’m going to win in this competition if it kills me!” “I want my price, and my terms if I’m going to do this”

In my experience, most sellers are not all that competitive this way. They just want to sell their house and move on. It’s also kind of true that the house you like ends up with multiple offers and your ability to feel like the big winner could be sort of compromised. Here’s my observation after 21 years of doing this…relax. Make the house the most important thing. Make a good, fair offer and negotiate fair terms. If you get it…fantastic! If not, another one is just around the corner. In my experience the best transactions are the ones where everybody wins. The Giants are champions…and that works for me.

Contingent Sales

buy-sell-exchange-photo

Every once in awhile a client comes to me with a plan to buy another house, yet they need to sell their existing home in order to accomplish that. They want to make an offer contingent upon the sale of that home. In their mind it is the safest alternative because they’re frightened of the idea that, if they sell their home first, they’ll get stuck during an escrow period or a rent back and be forced into a purchase that they really don’t want. They also, in all honesty, feel more in control if they can buy the dream home and then sell their existing home…possibly closing the two concurrently.

While this idea certainly sounds appealing, it’s been my experience that it almost never works out the way people imagine it will. First of all, I’ve probably looked at hundreds of offers while representing sellers over the years and I’ve never seen one of my clients ratify with a contingency offer like this. Why would a seller, particularly in this market, take their place off the market and wait for somebody else to sell their place…a place they know nothing about. The only reason I can think of is if the buyer with the contingent offer does everything the seller wants regarding price and terms. Even then it’s rare! A buyer with a contingent offer loses almost all of their leverage to negotiate…and then they have to aggressively price their original property in order for it to move quickly. Let’s see here 1) pay too much for the new place and 2) sell for too little for the old place…what an idea!

Here’s a really big lesson that I’ve learned in the last 20 years…there is no such thing as the perfect house. If you lose a house that you really, really love…there will be another one coming along that you like just as much. I promise. Sell your existing home first. Price it reasonably, sell it and then go shopping for the new home. There are exceptions of course, like if you have enough cash to buy first without selling, but contingency offers are very problematic. If you sell your original home and have a 30-45 day escrow you can negotiate a rent back of, say, 30-45 days. During that time I know you’ll be able to find a home you really like. I’ve been a part of it dozens of times.

Changing The Locks

locks

When you bought your home, did you change the locks? Probably not, since the folks you bought from sure seemed nice…and most likely they are. What you don’t know is who those nice folks gave their key to while they lived there. Could be they gave a copy to their babysitter, or the neighbors, or Mr. sellers ex has a copy from way back. I recently had a sale where the seller had 5 different keys to open 3 separate exterior doors. Who knows how many copies of these are floating around?

The point is that as the owner of your new home you really don’t know who else has a key. Of course the chances are good that nobody will ever use one of those keys to gain access to your home when you’re not there…but you never know.

When buying a property it’s always a good idea to change the locks…and have all of them work off of one or two keys maximum.